Does Gemini Code? What It Can Do and What to Check
Gemini can write, review and explain code across several interfaces, from the web app to the Gemini CLI in your terminal. Here is what each option covers and what to keep in mind before you ship.
Updated 6 min read
Yes, Gemini writes code. You can ask it to generate, review, debug and explain code in the gemini.google.com web app, through Gemini CLI in your terminal, and through Gemini Code Assist in editors such as VS Code and JetBrains IDEs. Each interface has a different fit depending on whether you are exploring a problem or working inside an active project.
The output always needs review. How much context Gemini holds about your project depends on the interface and how you set it up. Tools like fenbs keep the task description, test criteria and known constraints outside the session, so that context stays available when you change interfaces or hand the work to a different assistant.
What Gemini can do with code
Gemini handles a wide range of coding tasks: generating functions, classes and scripts from a description; explaining existing code line by line; debugging by reading error messages alongside the surrounding code; writing unit tests for a given function; converting code between languages; and reviewing pull request diffs.
It works across multiple programming languages. Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, Go, Rust and C++ are among the languages it handles reliably. For less common languages, check the output against the language's own documentation rather than assuming correctness.
For a direct comparison of Gemini's coding capabilities alongside Claude Code's, see the gemini-cli-vs-claude-code guide.
The three main interfaces for coding with Gemini
The web app at gemini.google.com is the easiest place to start. Paste in a function or an error message and ask a question. It works well for isolated problems where you do not need to share multiple files at once.
Gemini CLI runs in your terminal and can read files from your project directory. This closes the gap between the model and your actual codebase. You point it at a file and ask questions; it reads the code rather than requiring you to paste it. The gemini-cli-vs-gemini-code-assist comparison covers when CLI is the better choice over the editor integration.
Gemini Code Assist integrates directly into VS Code, JetBrains IDEs and other supported editors. It provides inline completions and a chat panel that knows which file you have open. For teams using Google Workspace, Code Assist also has an enterprise tier with additional admin controls. The gemini-code-assist-vs-copilot comparison covers when each is the stronger choice.
Context: what Gemini actually sees in a session
When you use the web app, Gemini only sees what you paste in. A long context window does not help if you do not share the relevant files. In Gemini CLI and Code Assist, you control which files you share, and the session can include multiple files.
Project context — the task description, acceptance criteria, style rules and decisions already made — still needs to come from somewhere. If you do not pass that context at the start of a session, Gemini will make assumptions or ask you to provide it mid-task, which slows things down.
Bring the task context into every session
fenbs keeps the task description, Decisions and rules, and Where we left off in one place. Connect Gemini CLI to your fenbs project over MCP (see Integrations) and ask it to read the project context before writing the first line of code. Your constraints and instructions are in the session from the start.
Create a free accountFree for one person · No credit card · Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and more
What Gemini does not do for code
Gemini does not run your code on your machine by default. You write its output to a file and run it yourself. Some Gemini plans include a code execution environment for data analysis tasks, but that is separate from running a server or a test suite in your actual project.
Gemini Code Assist does not push code to your repository or merge pull requests. It writes and suggests; a person reviews and commits. If you want a coding agent that takes those steps autonomously, that is a different category of tool with its own access requirements and review considerations. For a comparison of Claude Code versus Gemini's agent-level product, check the Gemini Jules documentation on the Google AI site.
Choosing the right interface for your coding task
| Task | Best interface |
|---|---|
| Debugging an isolated function or error message | Web app (paste the code and error) |
| Working inside a local project with multiple files | Gemini CLI |
| Inline completions while writing code | Gemini Code Assist in VS Code or JetBrains |
| Enterprise team using Google Workspace | Gemini Code Assist Enterprise tier |
| Comparing Gemini output with another assistant on the same task | Any interface, with the same context stored in fenbs |
How to do this with fenbs
- Create a free account and add your coding project to fenbs.
- Write the task description, acceptance criteria and any Decisions and rules for the project (style guide, libraries to use, test requirements).
- Connect Gemini CLI to your fenbs project over MCP. See Integrations for current connection steps.
- At the start of each session, ask Gemini CLI to read the fenbs context for the project, so your instructions and constraints are in the session before you start.
- When the session ends, save the task progress to fenbs so the next session — on any supported assistant — starts from the same state.
For Gemini's tools for working with documents and research alongside code, see the gemini-notebook guide. For reusable instructions in Gemini (Gems are moving to skills on personal accounts from November 2026), see the gemini-gems guide.
Reviewing the output before you ship
Before merging or deploying anything Gemini wrote, run your test suite and read the diff. Check for placeholders, comments that say "implement this", unused library imports and functions that match the name you asked for but miss edge cases from your requirements.
AI-generated code often looks correct at a glance and fails on a second input that differs from the examples you gave. Test the boundary conditions, not just the expected case. The value of an AI coding assistant is in the first draft; the value of your own review is in what actually ships.